Home > Failed To > Failed To Load Module Fglrx Loader Failed 7

Failed To Load Module Fglrx Loader Failed 7

If yum behaves as you expect, the prospect of being able to do 'yum install kmod-fglrx-legacy' and have it obsolete the old package is very appealing (providing all the install scripts http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI4MDE Tags: None entropy Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 1006 #2 01-21-2013, 07:27 PM Originally posted by Phoronix An official change-log for the legacy version of Catalyst 13.1 has Offline #4 2014-07-30 23:07:48 headkase Member From: Canada Registered: 2011-12-06 Posts: 1,604 Website Re: [Solved] Xorg fglrx module not properly loading You would probably be better served by just downgrading to How is it a good sign? Source

A quick recompilation and a verification that LoadExtension did indeed make it into the final binary later, I've eliminated all the errors but the "Failed to load module 'fglrx' (module does Do you see the desktop now? fglrx-kmod-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.nosrc.rpm fglrx-x11-drv-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm fglrx-x11-drv-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.nosrc.rpm fglrx-x11-drv-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm fglrx-x11-drv-32bit-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm fglrx-x11-drv-devel-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm fglrx-x11-drv-devel-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm kmod-fglrx-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm kmod-fglrx-13.1-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm Please test these latest drivers and let us know if they fix the issue. If someone knows otherwise, please feel free to confirm with evidence here.

Precise 12.04 Review | Things to do after Installing 12.04 | Troubleshoot & Customize Unity | Android Blog - Cell Rabta Adv Reply October 21st, 2010 #6 fredrikj View Profile All my 5xxx series cards are working with the 13.1 drivers. (0002946) wolfy (developer) 2013-03-15 05:05 My bad. I don't particularly want to test this either; it took me a solid day to get a stable system, so I'm just going to mark this thread as solved. Looks like the package is behaving as expected.

I guess 13.1 should get packaged and shipped for the older cards, mentioning everywhere in large bold letters that they work up to xorg 1.12 only. (0002960) Yves Bellefeuille (reporter) 2013-03-15 Assuming default VMAP API Assuming default munmap APIdoing Makefile based build for kernel 2.6.x and highermake -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.1.el5xen/build SUBDIRS=/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x modulesmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-8.1.1.el5-xen-i686' CC [M] /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.o/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:46:2: error: #error unknown or undefined Offline #8 2014-07-30 23:18:16 electrojustin Member Registered: 2014-04-12 Posts: 8 Re: [Solved] Xorg fglrx module not properly loading Oh was I supposed to use that method? fglrx-x11-drv-legacy-12.8 does seem like an appropriate name to me. (0002932) wolfy (developer) 2013-03-14 01:12 It is expected and well documented under the "known issues" section at http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-fglrx [^] .

How does Decommission (and Revolt) work with multiple permanents leaving the battlefield? So the initial issue is resolved. That said, they are not known for backporting support for newer versions of X into their legacy drivers as NVIDIA do. Get More Information Please execute the following command, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect xorg When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-bug' and the

kmod-fglrx) even if kmod-fglrx-legacy also obsoletes kmod-fglrx <=12.4 . The root issue is that AMD has decided not to develop the fglrx driver further for your chipset as documented in that report. On startx it displays Failed to load module fglrx (module does not exist 0) No drivers available ddxsiggiveup :closing log giving up xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2).unable to I will figure that out later.

Perhaps I screwed up the process?Edit: spelling error Last edited by electrojustin (2014-07-30 23:17:12) Offline #6 2014-07-30 23:17:06 karol Archivist Registered: 2009-05-06 Posts: 25,436 Re: [Solved] Xorg fglrx module not properly https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=120216 Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support Installation & Upgrades [SOLVED] Cannot reach desktop ("Failed Connecting via SSH failed too.When I set composite to true the xserver works fine (without dri).lsmod lists fglrx.I just switched from FC6 where I used the fglrx driver rpm package from As of difference: since there was no existing package prior to install ( I manually removed the previous version), -i and -U should have behaved the same.

I had no such problems with that driver.Is there a rpm-version of the driver for C5/ RHEL5 or any other solution?Thanks! this contact form Working... sudo apt-get install mesa-utils share|improve this answer answered Jul 16 '12 at 16:17 Marco Scannadinari 5691719 add a comment| up vote -1 down vote Delete /etc/X11/xorg.conf and try again. The download page says Linux 3.4 and X.Org 1.12.

I think this is the key log entry that tells us that Xorg 1.13 is not yet supported: [ 65.798] (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension (0002849) pperry The download page says Linux 3.4 and X.Org 1.12. Comment Post Cancel Rigaldo Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 245 #5 01-21-2013, 08:30 PM If someone can confirm whether it has Xorg 1.13 support(test it .. :/), it'd be have a peek here I'll mark this a duplicate of it and thank you for reporting this.

I'm able to use the TFT's native resolution (1680x1050, the vesa driver did only support lower resolutions).Login as root. I ammended the CentOS 6.4 Release Notes accordingly. (0002947) wolfy (developer) 2013-03-15 05:43 For what it's worth: we've just tested the most recent 3 versions of kmod-fglrx that exist now in Comment Post Cancel foutrelis Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3 #8 01-22-2013, 02:08 AM Error when running with xorg-server 1.13: Code: [ 16.416] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so [ 16.857] (EE)

It seems to turn on (purple light), then turns off with 1-second intervals.

In fglrx-13.1 ATI removed support for the 3/4/5xxx series so one MUST use the -legacy drivers. (0002942) dragonfly (reporter) 2013-03-14 14:20 I have a AMD FirePro 3D V4800. Join Date Apr 2009 Location Rawalpindi, Pakistan Beans 5,666 DistroUbuntu Gnome Development Release Re: Cannot reach desktop ("Failed to load module "fglrx") after upgrading You mean it is not automatically booting Edwin Zakaria (4) Marcus Hüwe (39) Marcus Meissner (2) Marcus Moeller (3) Marcus Schaefer (4) Martin Lasarsch (8) Martin Mohring (11) Masim "Vavai" Sugianto (20) Michael Andres (1) Michael Löffler (7) I believe I have already done what you asked when I ran the command ubuntu-bug xorg and uploaded the file here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1259423/+attachment/3926455/+files/apport.xorg.u992bm.apport as seen in comment #1 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1259423/comments/1 ) Let

The odd part is that xorg.conf WAS created. (0002851) pperry (administrator) 2013-03-01 11:37 Thanks for the clarification Wolfy. This is something I've not considered before and I must admit I would also have instinctively used -Uvh so perhaps you've found a bug! (0002850) wolfy (developer) 2013-03-01 10:43 I ran This and the newer proprietary fglrx-9.003.3.3 driver failed with the error: [ 22.664] (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension I *successfully* fixed the problems after uninstalling the proprietary http://juicecoms.com/failed-to/failed-to-load-module-fbdevhw-invalid-module-0.html So the code is there, we just have to figure out how to get it to build again.

If you can figure out what's going wrong I'd be glad to fix it. Thanks for the help. But as we suspect, I expect these to fail on 6.4 due to lack of support for Xorg 1.13 (assuming AMD's documentation is correct). If I run "startx", I get: ...

The fglrx-legacy-x11-drv package obviously isn't compatible with the version of xorg in 6.4 so I've added a Conflict for xorg-x11-server-Xorg >= 1.13 In summary, these packages should support older 2000, 3000